­
MuMoLaDe - Multiscale Modeling of Landslides and Debris - ESR12: irstea (IRSTEA), France & Grenoble Institute of Technology (INPG), France

ESR12: ir­stea (IR­STEA), Fran­ce & Grenob­le In­stitute of Tech­nology (INPG), Fran­ce

Model­ing of the mech­an­ical be­havior of flexib­le struc­tures against de­bris flows

Super­visor: Dr. Ing Stéphane Lam­bert (IR­STEA), Prof. Fran­cois Nicot (IR­STEA) & Ass. Prof. Bruno Chareyre (Lab. 3SR)

Ob­jec­tive: Rea­lis­tic as­sump­tion of im­pact force, Valida­tion and new de­signs of pro­tec­tion struc­tures, Guideline for di­men­sion­ing of pro­tec­tion struc­tures;

Met­hodology: De­bris flows are one of the most severe risks af­fect­ing moun­tain­ous areas. Strong­ly di­ctated by the weath­er con­di­tions (storms, rain­falls), pre­dict­ing and pre­vent­ing the oc­curr­ence of such eventsemain very dif­ficult tasks. Mitiga­tion ac­tions con­s­ist usual­ly in sett­ing up specific struc­tures in tor­rent beds in order to con­trol de­bris flows when oc­cur­red. An in­novative sol­u­tion con­s­ists in flexib­le struc­tures, for in­stan­ce made up of wire nets placed ac­ross the tor­rent bed sec­tion. Such open struc­tures make water flows pos­sible, but can con­trol more visc­ous flows such as de­bris flows with a pos­sible frac­tion of gravel or rocks. The thesis will focus on the mech­an­ical be­havior of such struc­tures, by de­velop­ing a numer­ical tool with en­gineer­ing pur­poses. To this aim, a dis­crete ele­ment met­hod will be used (YADE open software), to de­scribe both the mudflow and the flexib­le struc­ture in in­terac­tion (Nicot et al., 2004 and 2007). A specific at­ten­tion will be given to the model­ing of de­bris flows, de­scribed as a saturated granular as­semb­ly. Re­cent de­velop­ments (Chareyre et al., 2012) car­ried out to model saturated granular materi­als with in­tern­al flows will be ac­coun­ted for. Fin­al­ly, com­parisons with case stud­ies will be done in order to validate the numer­ical tool, and pract­ical re­com­menda­tions (geometr­ical con­figura­tion, size, con­stitutive materi­als) will be drawn in order to opt­im­ize the re­sul­tant for­ces de­veloped in the dif­ferent parts of the struc­tures.

De­liver­able: Valida­tion of pro­tec­tion struc­ture de­signs based on im­pact for­ces from WP3, Guidelines for di­men­sion­ing of pro­tec­tion struc­tures;

Second­ments: INPG: 12 p-ms (numer­ical simula­tion), ETHZ: 2 p-ms (DEM crosslink), GEOB (pro­tec­tion sys­tems)

Re­fer­ences: Chareyre, B., Cor­tis, A., Cat­alano, E., Barthélemy, E. (2012): Pore-scale model­ing of visc­ous flow and in­duced for­ces in dense sphere pack­ings. Trans­port in Por­ous Media, Vol. 9(2), pp. 473-493. Nicot, F. (2004) : From con­stitutive modell­ing of a snow­cov­er to the de­sign of flexib­le struc­tures. Part II, Some numer­ical as­pects. In­ter­nation­al Journ­al of Sol­ids and Struc­tures, Vol. 41, pp. 3339-3352. Nicot, F., Be­rtrand, D., Got­teland, P., and Lam­bert, S. (2007): Multi­scale approach for geo-composite cel­lular struc­tures sub­jec­ted to rock im­pacts. Int. J. Num. Anal. Met­hods in Geomec­hanics, Vol. 31, pp. 1477-1515.

Loading...